denyingphoenix (logo)

History Unfolding

Originally posted on April 19, 2005

It’s true, I almost never talk about my religion. It’s personal, private and can so easily offend pretty much every other soul on the planet.

However, today, my Church elected a new Pope. Pope Benedict the 16th…formerly Cardinal Joseph Ratzinger of Germany. Head of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith. In short, someone who I had completely discounted for his so-called labeled “fundamentalism.”

I am now so pleasantly surprised.

Truth be told, I am an old-school Catholic. I like my Sunday services with less guitar and less ‘community.’ I find beauty (and ultimately God) in the ceremony of reverence and presentation. There’s a simple elegance to a traditional Mass that has long been pushed to the curb, especially in America. I never understood why the hand-holding, craft-making, camp song-singing masses of the counterculture revolution had to change a faith that’s been established for over 1900 years.

The pasteurization of my faith came through the 70s, during the cultural shifts (both globally and nationally). The church that I grew up with is all that I know, but I know that I do not like it. I can spot a fraud. And my current church (note the lowercase ‘c’ as denoting the physical church, not Church at large) is a fraud. I’m all for making religion “accessible” to modern day people, but cheapening it is not the way. And in my own, humble opinion, my Catholic faith has been a cheap substitution for as long as I’ve been alive.

John Paul did, as we all have been told over the past several weeks, amazing things for the faith. He brought it out of Rome and into the hands of the people. He was the true pilgrim of the faith. Among many other things, he demystified the position of the Vicar of Christ. But in the process, many people crucified him for not addressing the crumbling faith. I personally think that he knew that that was not his charge…he had other things to attend to (dissolution of Communism, etc).

And is it not fitting that now Benedict XVI is the man in charge of the Doctrine of the Faith? Perhaps now to attend to the rebuilding of the Faith itself, around the world? I also wonder if, since this supposed ‘fundamentalism’ will likely be received with ill acceptance the world over, an actual schism of the faith would occur. American Catholicism vs. Roman Catholicism? I could see it happening. I could also see this papacy being one of Peace…extending peace throughout the world. In a globe torn by religious strife and wars, I could easily see this as Benedict’s papal banner.

I don’t pretend to know anything. I just have my hopes.



Comments

I don't know enough about the new pope and his policies to think good or bad at the moment.

But yet, for 2 reasons, I have to wonder if an opportunity was missed today.

1) Benedict XVI is 78 years old already. John Paul II was 85 when he passed away. Odds of another conclave within the next 10 years - Fairly high. It just doesn't seem like Benedict XVI is likely to be around long enough, and I have to wonder why the papacy didn't go to someone at least a little bit younger.

2) Considering the increasing secularization in Europe and North America, why not a Pope from South America or even Africa? Why not show the world that the Catholic church is truly, well, catholic?

said Rudy

I agree. I think for several reasons they chose an older Pope. In my own uninformed opinion, I think they want this papacy to be 'transitional,'since JPIIs was so long (in many people's eyes).

While I personally thought Arinzee would be the first black pope...perhaps he's next. Perhaps if Ratzinger's tenure is short, the world will be better prepared for a black pope?

Call me naiive, but since I know not of any of this, I can only trust that those electing the next Bishop of Rome know what they're doing.

I sure as hell don't know what they're doing.

said b

or is this just another way of showing the modernization of the church. In our society today(especially America) we are so used to our leaders being in the public eye for 2, 4, or 8 years. Is it just that we're so unsure about our decisions anymore that cause us to shorten the terms that officials are elected?

food for thought

said brad

I will be honest... i am not sure about Benedict XVI , however i did have ratizinger as being the odds on favorite... while Arinzee would seem like a an amazing choice for both Africa and black catholics througout the world, he sealed his fate with a commencement speech that he gave at Georgetown years back. The Church sees homosexuality as wrong but his comments went over the line from condemnation to damndation...

As for our South American brothers... the church has spent too much time supressing liberation theology and its supporters... point blank...

as for our new pope... yes he is old... he will be a tranisitional... but from a people humanistic standpoint i don't get the welcoming feeling that i did with JPII... it maybe that i knew him longer... but something in Benedict's eyes really irks me and i can't put my finger on it...

said workingpoor

Comments are currently closed.

Did You Know?

Harvard Bound

When I was young, I used to use Harvard Graphics (DOS-based presentation software) to make sweet pictures.

The closest I got to ivy league was neon green and pink geometric patterns with 16-color gradients.

Use Firefox. See columns.